Supreme Court lets troops sue military contractors

Summary

The Supreme Court ruled that U.S. troops may sue military contractors over injuries caused by contractor negligence in combat zones.

Why this matters

The ruling narrowed legal protections for military contractors and allows service members to pursue claims for injuries tied to contractor conduct in war zones. It also reversed a lower-court standard that had broadly barred such lawsuits.

The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that U.S. troops may sue military contractors for injuries suffered in combat zones if a contractor’s mistakes or negligence caused the harm.

In a 6-3 decision, the court sided with Army Specialist Winston Hencely, who was severely injured in a 2016 suicide bombing at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan. Five soldiers were killed and 17 were wounded. Hencely, then 20, suffered a fractured skull and brain injuries and is permanently disabled.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil M. Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Thomas wrote that neither federal law nor the Constitution shields military contractors from liability when their actions injure service members. He has previously objected to court precedents that barred troops from suing the U.S. government over injuries, including those tied to medical treatment, and said that rule should not be extended to contractors.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. dissented, joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh.

“Because the Constitution gives the federal government exclusive authority over foreign affairs and the conduct of wars, federal law preempts all state law that substantially interferes with the Government’s exercise of those powers,” Alito wrote.

According to the Army, Hencely tried to stop and question Ahmad Nayeb, an Afghan employee, as he approached soldiers gathered for a Veterans Day 5K race. The Army said Hencely’s actions “likely prevented a far greater tragedy.”

An Army investigation found that Fluor Corp., which had a contract to run operations at the base, was primarily responsible for the attack. The report said Fluor was negligent in hiring Nayeb, whom it said had been a Taliban operative, and failed to supervise him closely.

Hencely sued Fluor over his injuries, but a federal judge in South Carolina and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the suit. The appeals court said, “During wartime, where a private service contractor is integrated into combatant activities over which the military retains command authority, a tort claim arising out of the contractor’s engagement in such activities shall be preempted.”

The Supreme Court reversed that ruling, allowing Hencely’s lawsuit to move forward.

  • France confirms breach at agency handling IDs

    The breach may have affected millions of people.

    Full story +

  • Lufthansa loses EU top court fight over 2020 bailout

    Lufthansa has already repaid the bailout. It was not clear what effect the ruling would have.

    Full story +

  • UK, France strike 3-year Channel migration deal

    According to British authorities, 41,472 people reached the United Kingdom in small boats in 2025, the second-highest total since large-scale crossings were first recorded in 2018. At least 29 migrants died in the Channel last year.

    Full story +

  • Iran fires on ships in Hormuz after ceasefire delay

    Iranian officials say the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) seized two ships and fired on another.

    Full story +

  • EU nears approval of $106B Ukraine loan package

    The European Union has also been trying since February to approve a new package of sanctions on Russia, which Hungary and Slovakia have blocked.

    Full story +

  • Former official urges broader Indo-Pacific command

    U.S. Indo-Pacific Command is already the largest of the six combatant commands in the Unified Command Plan, covering more than half the Earth’s surface, about half its population, and several major militaries.

    Full story +

  • U.S. details Indo-Pacific buildup amid China concerns

    Adm. Samuel Paparo, commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, said China’s military activity around Taiwan increasingly resembled preparation for possible conflict. Officials also urged allies to assume a larger defense role. 

    Full story +

  • Gold Falls, U.S. stock futures fall, oil rises above $100

    Silver, platinum, and palladium also fell as oil rose for a fourth straight day.

    Full story +

  • Army rolls out fitness test for combat troops

    The Army will begin implementing the annual test this month. For the first year, soldiers who do not pass will not face adverse administrative action. Those who cannot meet the standards may request voluntary reclassification.

    Full story +

  • Marine Corps rolls out standard app before PCS moves

    Marine Corps Community Services launched a standard app to replace some local base apps ahead of PCS season.

    Full story +