U.S. Lawmakers Back Taiwan Defense Budget Amid Stalemate

Summary

U.S. senators support Taiwan's stalled $40 billion defense budget amid China’s objections.

Why this matters

The support emphasizes U.S. commitment to Taiwan's self-defense amid regional security tensions with China.

U.S. lawmakers expressed support on Monday for Taiwan’s efforts to pass a $40 billion defense budget stalled in its opposition-controlled parliament.

A bipartisan group of four senators, including Jeanne Shaheen and Jacky Rosen (Democrats), and John Curtis and Thom Tillis (Republicans), visited Taiwan to strengthen U.S.-Taiwan ties amid rising tensions with China. The group met with Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te during a two-day visit primarily focused on enhancing informal relations between the U.S. and Taiwan.

China views Taiwan as a breakaway province and opposes official exchanges with Taiwan by any countries it has diplomatic ties with, including the U.S.

During the visit, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson urged the U.S. to stop sending ‘wrong signals’ to Taiwanese independence forces, stating China would ‘safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity.’

The defense budget proposes investments over eight years in missile defense, AI integration, and Taiwan’s defense industry. Opposition parties have suggested smaller budgets. President Lai emphasized the importance of passing the budget to continue strengthening Taiwan’s defense capabilities.

Curtis acknowledged Taiwan’s progress in defense and energy security, noting that Taiwan’s efforts are recognized and supported in Washington, D.C.

Meanwhile, opposition leader Cheng Li-wun announced plans to visit China next month to foster peaceful relations with Beijing. There are no confirmed plans for her to meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

This visit comes ahead of a summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, where arms sales to Taiwan are expected to be a topic of discussion.

Get Camp Lejeune & New River Updates

Essential base alerts, local events, and military news delivered to your inbox

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


  • Israel Moves to Enact Death Penalty for Palestinians
    Israel’s parliament approved a controversial bill allowing the death penalty for Palestinians convicted of deadly terror attacks in the occupied West Bank. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, supported the bill, while 48 opposed it. The legislation, spearheaded by National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir from the far-right party, applies to military courts for West Bank Palestinians, making the death penalty the default for intentional deadly attacks deemed acts of terrorism. The bill also provides for life imprisonment in special circumstances. The measure varies for civilian courts, which try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and East Jerusalem residents. Under this law, those convicted of killing with the aim of harming Israeli citizens or residents to threaten the state’s existence face death or life imprisonment. Executions are to be conducted by hanging within 90 days of sentencing, with a possible extension of up to 180 days. Critics argue the law discriminates against Palestinians. The Association for Civil Rights in Israel filed a petition with the Supreme Court challenging the legislation, citing its conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws against arbitrary discrimination. Opposition lawmaker Ram Ben Barak criticized the bill’s unequal application, arguing it creates a divide between laws for Arabs in the West Bank and the wider Israeli public. The Palestinian Authority denounced the law, stating it falls within a colonial agenda and lacks jurisdiction over Palestinian territories. Internationally, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy expressed concern that the bill risks undermining Israel’s commitment to democratic principles. Amnesty International had previously called for its rejection, citing discrimination concerns. The new law reflects broader tensions following increased violence in the region since the October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel.
  • US-Israeli Strikes Impact Key Sites in Iran, Tensions Rise
    US-Israeli airstrikes on Tuesday reportedly damaged a leading pharmaceutical firm in Iran that produces cancer and anesthetic drugs, Iran’s government stated on X. The pharmaceutical firm is owned by Iran’s Social Security Investment Company, a state-run entity. Israel is prepared for extended confrontations with Iran, according to military spokesperson Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani. Four individuals in southern Dubai were injured due to debris from a missile interception, Emirates officials reported. State media reported the damage to a Shia mosque in northwest Iran, highlighting cultural losses amid ongoing conflict. China expressed appreciation for assistance as three of its ships transited the Strait of Hormuz, crucial for energy transportation, amid regional tensions. Pakistani Foreign Minister intends to discuss Iran during an official visit to China. Indonesia condemned attacks in southern Lebanon, which led to the deaths of two of its peacekeepers. The country emphasized the need for protection under international humanitarian law for peacekeeping personnel. Israel confirms four soldiers were killed in clashes with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Meanwhile, reports suggest the US is considering extending its military operations and negotiating with Iran, as tensions mount. Oil prices dropped, but stocks rose following reports indicating potential diplomatic progress between the US and Iran, although firm measures to reduce energy costs remain a global concern.
  • Spain Denies U.S. Airspace Use Amid Iran Conflict
    Spain closed its airspace to U.S. planes participating in military actions in Iran, Defense Minister Margarita Robles announced Monday. This decision aligns with Spain’s earlier refusal to allow the use of its military bases in the conflict. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has characterized the war as illegal and unjust. Robles emphasized, “Neither the bases are authorized, nor, of course, is the use of Spanish airspace authorized for any actions related to the war in Iran.” These remarks come amid Spain’s strong opposition to military operations by the U.S. and Israel in Iran, which began over a month ago. Sánchez has urged for an end to the hostilities, stating, “You cannot respond to one illegality with another, because that’s how humanity’s great disasters begin.” This stance led to threats from U.S. President Donald Trump to cut trade ties with Spain after Madrid denied access to the U.S. for its bases at Rota and Morón. The U.S. had previously made trade threats when Sánchez resisted increasing Spain’s defense spending to the 5% of GDP agreed upon by other NATO members. Instead, Spain proposed 2.1% as sufficient for meeting military commitments. In 1986, France and Italy restricted the U.S. from using their airspace for actions targeting Libya’s Moammar Gadhafi. Similarly, in 2003, Turkey denied the U.S. the use of its territory for the invasion of Iraq but allowed overflights. NATO has refrained from commenting on Spain’s decision.
  • Israeli F-16s Potentially Carry Cluster Munitions in Iran Strikes
    The Israeli Air Force released a photo showing F-16I Sufa fighters potentially carrying cluster munitions during strikes on Iran. The specific type of submunition was not identified. The release follows accusations from Iranian officials that the United States used BLU-91/B anti-tank mines, delivered via cluster bombs. This may align with an area denial strategy aimed at limiting missile launches. In a Hebrew-language post on X, the Israeli Air Force stated, “In parallel, the Air Force struck sites used for storing and launching ballistic missiles,” targeting Tehran weapons production. The operation involved over 150 fighter jets. The nighttime image shows munitions with features resembling U.S. air-dropped cluster munitions. Reports from Iran alleged U.S. use of BLU-91/B mines, part of the Gator scatterable system, but this has not been confirmed. The mines could be used to hinder access to missile sites.  
  • Oregon Senator Blocks Promotion of Three Military Officers
    Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., placed a hold on the promotions of Marine Lt. Col. Vincent Noble, Col. Thomas Siverts, and Navy Lt. Cmdr. Thomas MacNeil, citing past behavior and judgment that he believes make them unfit for higher roles. For Noble and MacNeil, Wyden highlighted their connections to controversial war zone incidents. Noble’s platoon, during a 2007 mission in Afghanistan, was involved in an ambush resulting in civilian casualties. Though a military court of inquiry found the platoon acted appropriately, Wyden cited investigations indicating misconduct, including a false report and urging subordinates to lie. MacNeil was linked to the 2017 case of Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher, accused of war crimes, including a prisoner’s death. Although acquitted of those charges, Gallagher was convicted for posing with the prisoner’s body—a photo that included MacNeil. Despite testifying against Gallagher, MacNeil faced no disciplinary action due to presidential intervention. Siverts was scrutinized for appearing on a podcast labeled antisemitic by the Anti-Defamation League. The podcast reportedly included violent rhetoric targeting Hegseth, and while the Defense Department Inspector General declined to investigate, Wyden questioned Siverts’s character and professionalism. Wyden expressed concern over how these nominations progressed past the Senate Armed Services Committee, emphasizing the need for military promotions to adhere to U.S. armed forces standards.