A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked a Pentagon policy requiring escorts for journalists in the building, ruling only for The New York Times, which brought the lawsuit.
The decision marked another setback for the Defense Department, as a judge has repeatedly rejected its efforts to limit press access.
“This Court has spoken at several points about the critical importance of protecting the freedoms enshrined in the First Amendment, and that evergreen message bears repeating: ‘Those who drafted the First Amendment believed that the nation’s security requires a free press and an informed people and that such security is endangered by governmental suppression of political speech. That principle has preserved the nation’s security for almost 250 years,’” U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman wrote in his decision. “As our country celebrates its 250th anniversary this very week, that principle must not be abandoned now.”
“This ruling strips away reasonable security measures and will make it easier for sensitive and classified information to reach our adversaries,” Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a post on X.
New York Times spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander said the decision “reaffirms the First Amendment rights of the press to cover the Pentagon without restrictions designed to prevent the public from knowing what the military is doing.”