Lawmakers on Friday said the Pentagon was failing to maintain a congressionally required effort to reduce civilian harm after a Defense Department inspector general report found the military had begun scaling back parts of the program.
At a House Armed Services Committee hearing, members questioned Army Secretary Dan Driscoll and acting Army Chief of Staff Gen. Christopher LaNeve about the report, which said the Defense Department had proposed eliminating or reducing major parts of the initiative, including the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence.
The Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan was launched in 2022 after scrutiny of civilian casualties from U.S. strikes and military operations overseas. It was intended to improve how the military tracked, investigated, and reduced civilian harm during combat.
According to the inspector general report, released Wednesday, the Pentagon in May 2025 submitted a legislative proposal asking Congress to repeal the law requiring the center. The report also said meetings had stopped, personnel had been lost or reassigned, and some funding had been halted before any formal decision on the program’s future.
“As a result, the DoD may not comply with its civilian casualties and harm policy (DoDI 3000.17), a policy required by Federal law,” the report said. It added that Joint Staff and command officials had linked the program’s performance to mission success.
Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, the committee’s top Democrat, told Driscoll, “As I understand it, the Department of Defense and Army has completely defunded that. You are in violation of the law right now on civilian harm.”
Rep. Jason Crow, a Colorado Democrat and Army veteran, said military success depended in part on support from local populations and that civilian deaths could undermine that goal. “Over the course of those tours, what became very obvious to me is that what we did lack was a full understanding about how to win the support of local populations,” he said. “We ultimately lost the support of the people in Iraq and Afghanistan, who we were there to serve and to help liberate.”
Driscoll said the Pentagon remained legally obligated to carry out the program and defended the Army’s handling of it. He said some of the disruption cited in the report resulted from organizational restructuring rather than an effort to end the program.